BuddyRoadhouse wrote:...or Red Hot Ranch, or Rand Red Hots.
Buddy
BuddyRoadhouse wrote:. . . The missing ketchup was much less obvious. Plus, the ketchup angle never occurred to me because I never would have expected to see ketchup in the first place, because WHAT KIND OF MONSTER (over the age of ten) PUTS KETCHUP ON A HOT DOG???
Buddy
G Wiv wrote:Jimmy’s Red Hots.
Pulaski and Grand.
(No poppy seeds)
Smart. The idea of ketchup being the missing visual didn't make a lot of sense since the hot dog itself is blocked and nowhere would serve it directly with ketchup on the fries. Also a location that's in the path of pudgym's bus routes and soda trips.G Wiv wrote:Jimmy’s Red Hots.
Pulaski and Grand.
(No poppy seeds)
ronnie_suburban wrote:LOL - gotta be Gene & Judes, then.
BuddyRoadhouse wrote:...or Red Hot Ranch, or Rand Red Hots.
G Wiv wrote:Jimmy’s Red Hots.
Pulaski and Grand.
(No poppy seeds)
Rene G wrote:The counter doesn't look right either.
This would have been a "clue" if it was actually a hot dog from one of those Italian beef places. Since it wasn't, it was a red herring to deceive us.pudgym29 wrote:My inference that what you were not seeing was a clue as to where it was was to make you ponder it was a hot dog from a stand more famous for its italian beef sandwich, and if I had taken a photo of the italian beef sandwich, you would have gotten the answer swiftly.