extramsg wrote:I'd like to see the calorie count on one slice of Lou Malnati's sausage w/ buttercrust.
extramsg wrote:I'd like to see the calorie count on one slice of Lou Malnati's sausage w/ buttercrust.
Cathy2 wrote:Itty bitty Hardee's query ... someone who'd likely prefer not to be named told me Hardee's is known more for their breakfast. I have never been to a Hardee's for breakfast, don't know what they offer and never heard anyone highlight their breakfast. Does this ring true to anyone else's experience?
Cathy2 wrote:Hi,
Itty bitty Hardee's query ... someone who'd likely prefer not to be named told me Hardee's is known more for their breakfast. I have never been to a Hardee's for breakfast, don't know what they offer and never heard anyone highlight their breakfast. Does this ring true to anyone else's experience?
Regards,
"At 1,420 calories, Hardee's new Monster Thickburger is actually pretty darn tasty"
By Phil Vettel
Tribune restaurant critic
Published December 14, 2004
copyright 2004 Chicago Tribune/Online Edition
[dead link]
ronnie_suburban wrote:A few of us tried the (new?) Most American Thickburgers at the office yesterday. Massively disappointing. Way worse than we thought they would be. Probably the cheapest, most low-grade hot dog imaginable. And a completely overcooked burger. Definitely way less than the sum of its parts . . .
1/3 Pound Most American Thickburger (w/ hot dog and potato chips)
I actually think this is a fun concept and with higher quality ingredients and better execution could be a great munch. Perhaps Redhot Ranch would be the ideal place to DIY this . . .
=R=
pairs4life wrote:Wait, there's a Hardee's by your office Ronnie?
ronnie_suburban wrote:A few of us tried the (new?) Most American Thickburgers at the office yesterday. Massively disappointing. Way worse than we thought they would be. Probably the cheapest, most low-grade hot dog imaginable. And a completely overcooked burger. Definitely way less than the sum of its parts . . .
1/3 Pound Most American Thickburger (w/ hot dog and potato chips)
I actually think this is a fun concept and with higher quality ingredients and better execution could be a great munch.
=R=
Chicago’s only Hardee’s could soon open at the southeast corner of Halsted and Division, attached to an Exxon gas station at 736 W. Division Street.
Dave148 wrote:Chicago’s only Hardee’s could soon open at the southeast corner of Halsted and Division, attached to an Exxon gas station at 736 W. Division Street.
https://chicago.eater.com/2023/1/18/235 ... ttractions
Jim-Bob wrote:Dave148 wrote:Chicago’s only Hardee’s could soon open at the southeast corner of Halsted and Division, attached to an Exxon gas station at 736 W. Division Street.
https://chicago.eater.com/2023/1/18/235 ... ttractions
I wonder if this is just a one off location or whether we will see more Hardee's in the area. It seems like they rapidly expanded into the area about 10 years ago and disappeared almost as quickly. Also, that article is wrong. Hardee's has a lot more than four locations in Illinois. According to their website, they have 85
Great Zeus, thank you for saying this. They are terrible. I can't figure out how they ruin them so thoroughly. Even worse than the fries at Del Taco. And spot on about the taste of Domino's pizza.jlawrence01 wrote:... Personally, I cannot believe how BAD the In-n-Out french fries are. They have the same cardboard taste of a Domino's box.